US foreign aid spending may be shifting from poverty reduction to democracy promotion, and democracy may not do much to help the poor.
US foreign aid spending may be shifting from poverty reduction to democracy promotion, and democracy may not do much to help the poor.
Democracy being what exactly?!
From the Michael Ross paper (second link):
We use two alternative measures of regime type. One is based on the Polity IV dataset, which contains separate 0– 10 measures of democracy and authoritarianism for each country-year; following standard practice, we combine these two measures to produce a 21-point scale, which we call POLITY.
The other measure allows for a country’s history of democratic rule to influence its infant and child mortality rates. Several recent studies suggest that new democracies perform less well than established ones (Keefer and Vlaicu 2005; McGuire 2006). A state with 50 years of democratic experience, for example, might reduce infant mortality more quickly (or slowly) than a country with just one year of democratic experience.13 To explore this possibility, we use a variable that is based on the total number of years that each country has been a democracy, beginning in 1900; we take the natural log of this figure (DEMOCRATIC YEARS) to capture the intuition that the marginal benefits of democracy will diminish over time.