# Category Archives: Outsourcing

In line with my suggestion that labels simply say “made in a series of places”, the WTO has announced a “Made in the world” initiative. It aims “to support the exchange of projects, experiences and practical approaches in measuring and analysing trade in value added.” “Made in the world” should be a valuable initiative, at least until the arrival of interstellar trade.

In line with my suggestion that labels simply say “made in a series of places”, the WTO has announced a “Made in the world” initiative. It aims “to support the exchange of projects, experiences and practical approaches in measuring and analysing trade in value added.” “Made in the world” should be a valuable initiative, at least until the arrival of interstellar trade.

# Building redundancies into global supply chains

The FT takes a look at global supply chains in the wake of the recent tsunami:

In the past decade, many manufacturers have shifted component production to multiple contractors, often in low-wage Asian nations. This is to cut costs but it is also part of a general shift to slim operations and concentrate on what they regard as core areas, such as product development and marketing.

However, concurrent moves towards “lean production” – shaving inventories to the minimum and pushing parts through the system as fast as possible to cope with sudden variations in demand – have made supply chains increasingly susceptible to the kind of disruption seen in recent weeks in Japan…

“If all a manufacturer based in the US thinks about is unit costs, then it’s likely to have a global supply chain in which it transports components long distances [to a US assembly facility],” says Matthew Lovejoy, Acme’s president and owner. “But once you think about all the hidden costs that such complex chains involve, including disruptions in transport, the need to vary production to meet changes in your customers’ demands, plus the impact of unpredictable events like the Japan earthquake, then you realise these kinds of networks do not make sense.”

Accordingly, Mr Lovejoy has established three supply chains – each built around Acme’s three factories in Chicago, Brazil and Shenzhen, China. Each is largely autonomous but capable of supplying components to other parts of the business in the event of a sudden, localised disruption…

The lesson for industry from the Japanese disaster is that the consequences of such events on the global production system are always likely to be considerable. There are ways to reduce the sensitivity of supply chains to the effects of such incidents, through better planning and more distributed operations, but too few companies are taking advantage of them.

The whole article is worth reading. I previously mentioned this topic here.

Hat tip: Seb

If you found the Wall Street Journal‘s Wednesday story on gross value vs value added in trade statistics intriguing…

Trade statistics in both countries consider the iPhone a Chinese export to the U.S., even though it is entirely designed and owned by a U.S. company, and is made largely of parts produced in several Asian and European countries. China’s contribution is the last step—assembling and shipping the phones.
So the entire $178.96 estimated wholesale cost of the shipped phone is credited to China, even though the value of the work performed by the Chinese workers at Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. accounts for just 3.6%, or$6.50, of the total, the researchers calculated in a report published this month…

Mr. Lamy said if trade statistics were adjusted to reflect the actual value contributed to a product by different countries, the size of the U.S. trade deficit with China—$226.88 billion, according to U.S. figures—would be cut in half. To correct for that bias is difficult because it requires detailed knowledge of how products are put together. … then you might enjoy Robert Johnson and Guillermo Noguera’s “Accounting for Intermediates: Production Sharing and Trade in Value Added“: These adjustments imply that bilateral trade imbalances often differ in value added and gross terms. For example, the U.S.-China imbalance is approximately 30-40% smaller when measured on a value added basis, while the U.S.-Japan imbalance is approximately 33% higher. These adjustments point to the importance of triangular production chains within Asia. # Reasons to manufacture in the US FT: General Electric plans to invest$432m in four US centres that design and make refrigerators by 2014. The move will add about 500 jobs and reverse a long-term trend of outsourcing its appliance manufacturing to places such as China.

GE argues that a combination of US production quality, the ability to market goods as US-made, and rising transport, currency and labour costs in formerly cheap manufacturing countries have made the moves practicable.

# Bhagwati and Blinder: Offshoring of American Jobs

Jagdish Bhagwati and Alan Blinder discussed “Offshoring of American Jobs: What Response from U.S. Economic Policy?” at a Harvard symposium in 2007, with comments from Richard B. Freeman, Doug Irwin, Lori Kletzer and Robert Z. Lawrence. Those papers now appears as a book edited by Benjamin Friedman. Bhagwati and Blinder discussed offshoring last week on Bloomberg Radio (mp3).

Richard Cooper summarizes:

This stimulating collection, like the Harvard symposium that led to it, is built around Blinder’s strong and much-debated thesis that within two decades, 30-40 million U.S. jobs, mainly those in the services industries that require no direct contact between the provider and the customer, could be sent offshore — especially to India, where wages are low and English-speaking university graduates are plenty. Blinder argues that the United States should adapt its educational and labor policies to prepare for this possibility. Bhagwati, for his part, points out that offshoring is just one more dimension of an open trading system, which will produce higher living standards for Americans — and Indians. The contributors observe that this possibility will be similar in proportion to the adjustments that the U.S. economy has already made in past decades, particularly to the decline in manufacturing employment; that for a variety of reasons, not nearly so many jobs will move offshore; and that other countries will offshore some of their jobs to the United States.

The latter comment echoes Richard Baldwin’s argument that offshoring is more likely to be a two-way, intraindustry exchange than a one-way departure of jobs.

# Offshoring and the composition of home employment

At Vox, Sascha Becker, Karolina Ekholm, and Marc Muendler use firm-level data from Germany to assess how the job composition at home changes when firms offshore abroad:

How do offshoring firms reshape their domestic workforce? This column, using evidence from German multinationals, shows a positive correlation between offshoring and the firm’s proportion of highly educated workers. Offshoring firms have relatively more domestic jobs involving non-routine and interactive tasks. But offshoring is far from the only explanation for the shift towards more educated employees carrying out more advanced tasks.